@DrEarbuds
I've been a Youtuber for more than 10 years . I watch Cameras reviews every time something new comes out but I learned more from this channel in 3 video than all these other reviewers . You keep it dumb simple . You explain things very well for an average consumer .
@fernbeorn
My grandfather passed recently and I inherited a R7 and 7D Mark II he used for wildlife photography. This video really helped me understand some of the differences of the gear to help me become more like him. Thank you!
@osvaldodomingos9041
Quick correction: A Full frame DOES NOT has a crop factor of 0 (zero). It has a crop factor of 1, because you are basically multiplying the focal length, and multiplying by 1 doesn't change the result so the Full frame is not cropped. Other than that, great video.
@lawrencetisdall9850
I LOVE how you explain!! You don't talk down and make people feel bad , you tell your truth !! This was a Great video Thanks
@cjkuljis
I like the way you explain things to cater to someone like me who has zero camera knowledge. And the pace in which you explain it all is straight and to the point. I appreciate itš
@ZubairIndiaShah-lr7zy
Cost makes a huge difference. Full frame are expensive and their lenses and also more expensive than APS-C lenses. For most people watching this video APS-C will more than enough. Benefits of APS-C are smaller bodies and lenses make it easier to carry if you are using for personal use, much cheaper than full frames, and picture quality is still great and professional looking.
@brittanicates353
I have been watching camera reviews for a year and this is by the far the most well explained video I have seen. Thank you so much for keeping things simple while detailing what matters.
@Mithinco
Great explanation for beginners! Wish I saw this back when I started. Anyone new to photography should watch this
@garritj
This is what I was looking for. A simple, descriptive, and easy-to-understand explanation on this subject. Gained a follower here. This helped out a TON! Thanks!
@gregfd
Very good video. The current trend is convincing people that APS-C are the way to go and FF is just waisting money because sensor technology has significantly improved in recent years. Camera gears are expensive and APS-C is fine for many people but I'm glad at least someone is mentioning the "wide shot" capability of FF. This is a key point that speaks a lot to me
@ActualCounterfactual
With decades of photography experience under my belt, I find that the crop vs. full-frame sensor debate is often blown out of proportion. A talented photographer using quality lenses can produce stunning images, regardless of the sensor format. Ultimately, technique and artistic vision play a much more significant role than the technical specs of the sensor size. Letās be real: most people today canāt tell the make, model, or sensor size of an image just by looking at it on their phone or computer. The discussions around these issues often feel like a form of gaslighting, highlighting what are essentially first-world problems that are undetectable to the naked eye.
@VolvoGuy1969
10 years ago, FF was the goal because there was a much broader difference in regards to low noise, detail and dynamic range. Today, those differences still exist, but the gap is very narrow to almost imperceptible in some cases, at least in my experience. The march of technology changed the game. š
@bUnkkErr
Iāve always felt hesitant to start but youāre a great teacher. Definitely going to get a camera this week and get started šš½
@WritewheelUK
Thanks for the informative video. The MFT system has one major asset. Some years ago I started having chronic back pain. Itās from injury and age. I was told it was progressive. My full frame camera felt heavy after a morningās shooting and I often would take just one lens because of the weight. I opted for MFT. I recently went three hours carrying my Panasonic G9, 14-140mm, 100-300mm and my delightful Leica 1.4 25mm lenses, thatās 28-280, 200-600 and 50mm in what I call āold moneyā. I sat for forty minutes and then did a further two and a half hours. Thereās no way I could survive that with full frame and three lenses. I take photos at car shows, wildlife and wild flowers, all of which require a fair bit of walking and carrying. I have a āfishermanāsā vest in which I carry my spare lenses, batteries and such. I doubt I could carry a 200-600 full frame lens in it, not that I could have afforded one. If my back was no problem Iād probably have stuck with full frame out of pure idleness, but Iām pleased Iāve been forced to buy my G9. I love it.
@CarstenBruhn
One to consider: If you get a fullframe and use in cropmode to get reach, your effective resolution becomes less than that of the average APS-C resolution, unless you can shell out the cash for a 61Mpix FF cam.
@JacobG-M
Great summary, but I lost it on āMan eating Polar Bears in Afrikaā!! Darn, then bears must have really hit the local freezers! š
@kumasenlac5504
Recently bought a 10 year-old full frame camera and it brings me joy each day.
@verbal_kint
Though Iām aware of the pros and cons of each sensor type, this video was refreshing to watch. The polar bears in Africa analogy was a nice touch, keep up the good work!
@torto2024
For selfie vloggers, using a full-frame camera may not be the most suitable choice due to its larger and heavier wide lenses and camera body. I recommend opting for an APS-C camera with a lens focal length ranging from 11mm to 15mm.
@FulaanCreative